At 03:09 PM 1/16/2009, Eric Goldstein wrote: > >In the case of MF, it depends what you mean by "bests." Brightness, >contrast, reliability, flexibility, ease and production choices...all >a big yes in the digital column. Brightness in projection is one of >the most important factors in perceived enjoyment, and digital >especially has it all over analog here. Resolution, a big no. But >resolution is typically not a great issue with projection, because as >I said earlier, few observers will be seated ortho or better...We will just have to agree to disagree on this. I have never seen any digital system which came anywhere close to slides in terms of brightness, contrast, flexibility, and so forth, though I will concede that digital is more convenient. And you are the first person on the 'Net who has suggested anything to the contrary.
You say tomato, and I say tomahto. Marc msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list