[rollei_list] Re: Did Paul Simon predict the digital craze?

  • From: Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:53:49 -0500

It was my favorite film since before I started doing photography, absolutely the most beautiful and reliable color film available for most of my photographic life. Unlike all the others, when properly stored it doesn't fade or change color, confirmed every time I look at my slides from the 1950s and '60s, consisting of gorgeous Kodachromes and yucky Ekta/Ansco/whatevers. In the late 1970s, however, Kodachrome processing, previously rock solid, started to get a little squirrely. Return times were getting erratic, slides were sometimes off color or physically damaged.

I finally contacted the Kodak Findlay facility, where my mailers were sent, and from the manager heard an interesting and very candid explanation of what was causing the problems. It was apparently a "perfect storm" consisting of three factors: the previously reliable and bulletproof processing machinery in use for decades finally wore out and had been replaced with new equipment, digitally enhanced and still very buggy.

At the same time, all the experienced personnel had reached retirement age and, except for the manager who remained temporarily during the transition, were no longer there, leaving an essentially inexperienced crew to work some highly complicated equipment.

While all this was going on, Kodak closed a number of its Kodachrome processing facilities nationwide and those remaining had to deal with increased volume.

It was too much for me.  I held my nose and switched to the E6 films.

Actually, they are pretty good, but I still think Kodachrome has a unique beauty.

Allen Zak


On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Bob Shell wrote:


On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Peter K. wrote:

I haven't used it in more than 10 years. No loss to me.


Same here. The only time I shot Kodachrome after the 70s was whenever Kodak sent me some free samples and processing mailers. Otherwise it just wasn't worth the hassle.

Bob
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


--- Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: