[rollei_list] Re: Decline of Rollieflex/Film
- From: "Austin Franklin" <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:14:03 -0500
Hi Charlie,
I'm curious how you know that to be true.
Regards,
Austin
-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Newhouse230@xxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:01 PM
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Decline of Rollieflex/Film
Yes, there were a lot of photojournalists who used them, but their numbers
were dwarfed by the number of 'advanced amateurs'!
charlie silverman
In a message dated 3/25/2010 2:11:50 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
peterk727@xxxxxxxxx writes:
I guess all the Photojournalists who used them for their day to day work
did not know they were amateurs. :-)
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Elias_Roustom <elroustom@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Rollei TLR cameras were cameras for the advanced amateur market
mainly
Now that I didn't know. That's really interesting. Old news for you,
news to me.
Adds to the mystique. Thanks.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'in
the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
