Hi Jerry, > Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:17:05 -0800 (PST) > From: Jerry Friedman <tinycameraco@xxxxxxxxx> > > Neil > > Perhaps it would help if you recalled the astigmatism test > you had at your optician. You were shown two crossing > lines, of equal resolution but differing in terms of > contrast. As the lenses, and their rotation, put before > each eye changed, the lines looked increasingly different > --not in terms of actual resolution-- but in terms of > relative contrast. This is probably the best example I can > think of illustrating how clarity of image might be the > same (resolution) while they still might appear vastly > different to the eye. > > In my case, I have found that Zeiss lenses produce "better > images" which, for me, means greater contrast. Hence, my > fondness for some Tessars. Tessars may have poorer > resolution in the corners, but, for me, the increased > contrast at the center more than carries the load. > > Jerry Friedman > Thanks for your above analogy. I don't think that I presented the nature of my confusion very clearly and for that I apologize, as it has led to explanations of that which I do understand, such as a preference for higher contrast images even if they have lower resolution. I was considering the question of the relationship between contrast and resolution independent of the additional variable of perception, which I now understand as an unwritten "given" and in that context the matter is clear to me. Best regards, Neil --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list