----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 6:48 PM Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Completely OT- Loudspeaker info > Richard > > The people in the audio world refer to the planar > speakers, such > as the ones made by SME , Magnaplanar, and Martin-Logan, > as > dipoles. Some "dipole" speakers have the backwave > absorbed > almost completely. Then, are ribbon speakers "dipoles"? > All > that I have used, absorbed the backwave. > > Jerry > > Richard Knoppow wrote: Loudspeakers of the diaphragm type are all dipoles. That is energy is radiated from both sides with a 180 degree shift of polarity from one side to the other. Ribbon and electrostatic speakers are dipoles as or common moving coil and cone speakers. The loudspeaker inclosure does two things. First, it prevents destructive interference from the backwave radiating into the hemisphere as the front. Because most loudspeakers are small compared to the wavelength at low frequencies each side is strongly non-directional. If the speaker is placed in a baffle which is large enough the path length around it will prevent this kind of interference down to the frequency were the sound waves are able to bend around it. A fully enclosed box will completely prevent destructive interference by the back wave. The second purpose of at least some enclosures is to provide a better acoustical impedance match of the air to the loudspeaker. This is a somewhat complex subject. The air has a characteristic impedance. Just as in an electrical circuit the maximum transfer of energy takes place when the source impedance matches the sink impedance, and both are resistive. A small cone in air is both mismatched and very reactive. A closed box will improve matters somewhat but there is a still a rapid fall off of transferred energy below a wavelength approximately equal to the circumference of the loudspeaker. In order to improve this at low frequencies some sort of impedance matching device must be used. The two types most often encountered are the bass-reflex and the horn. A bass reflex enclosure is the analogue of an impedance matching filter section. A labrynth type box is the equivalent of a 1/4 wave matching section as used in radio frequency transmission lines. The Bass reflex is essentially a lumped constant version of this. A properly designed bass reflex enclosure will substantially improve the match over a fairly narrow range of frequencies. An acoustical horn is the analogue of an electrical transformer. One can see it as enlarging the size of the loudspeaker diaphragm to the size of the horn mouth although this is a gross simplification. When used for mid or high frequencies horns can be close to their ideal. This can yield a very great increase in the efficiency of power transfer and also be used to control distribution of the sound. At low frequencies an ideal horn is usually too large to be practical but a smaller horn can be used and still have considerable improvement in efficiency. For the minimum frequency possible a close box enclosure with a properly designed loudspeaker and lots of equalization is superior to the other forms due to size but is very ineffient. In the past large horn systems were use almost exclusively in motion picture theaters because electronic amplification was expensive. In more recent years large closed box systems have taken over for bass reproduction because power is now cheap and they deliver better, or deeper, bass. Horn midrange systems are still used because of their advantage in controlling distribution. Up to maybe the 1950's a typical 500 seat theater had about a 10 watt amplifier. Amplifiers as large as 50 watts could be found only in the largest theaters. Now one can have kilowatts if desired so speaker efficiency is no longer so important. All this takes me back to what seems like a previous life.