[rollei_list] Re: Comparative Mutar 0.7x Planar 2.8 vs 3.5
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:13:26 -0300
2012/8/10 Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Thanks, Carlos. My Mutars work well with my 2.8F and GX but, then, so does
> my Duonar.
Yes Marc, I have no doubt Rollei Mutars work fine on 2.8/80 lenses
from f/8 (factory says f5.6), the tests quoted previously found
differences for enormous enlargements out of the regular photographic
world, otherwise I did not buy a Mutar 0.7 with the BIII adapter, I
also have the 3.5F anyway. I don't like the Duonar, it only produces a
43mm image circle, it does not cover the entire 6x6 format, perhaqps
it works fine with the Rolleikin.
Carlos
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
