[rollei_list] Re: Comparative Mutar 0.7x Planar 2.8 vs 3.5
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:37:09 -0400
At 07:20 AM 8/10/2012, CarlosMFreaza wrote:
>It was said by Rollei and some Rollei books authors that Carl Zeiss
>Mutar lenses for the TLR have the best correction working in
>conjunction with the Planar 3.5/75 six elements because it was the
>best seller Rollei camera when the lenses were produced; at least it
>seems to be true for the following tests, made with the same Mutar
>0.7x and same photographer:
>
>http://www.grafikogfoto.dk/photographical/rollei_mutar07.html
>
>http://www.grafikogfoto.dk/photographical/rollei_mutar07_2.html
>
Thanks, Carlos. My Mutars work well with my 2.8F
and GX but, then, so does my Duonar.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
