[rollei_list] Re: "Circular debate" (was: Digital printing v. Analog)
- From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:47:37 -0400
On Sunday, April 17, 2005, at 08:12 AM, Neil Gould wrote:
>> We have this circular debate over and over and over again, and even
>> from an engineering POV, the assumptions made here are so out of
>> touch with reality as to render it both boring and useless... JMOs of
>> course...
>
> I find such debates to be amusing, at least for a while. Especially
> when it's a debate between experienced and knowledgable individuals
> who should know better. 8-)
It's a study in PSYCHOLOGY, not engineering. Just WHY do people, even
experts, persist in saying "black is white" (figuratively speaking, of
course?) I have yet to figure out the answer, but maybe such debates
will eventually reveal it.
Cheers.
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: "Circular debate" (was: Digital printing v. Analog)
