[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss issue 23

  • From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:04:53 -0800

Jay,

Believe me I won't, and neither will many others. ;-)

Peter K


On 1/19/06, Jayanand Govindaraj <jgovindaraj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Peter,
> I presume that Zeiss know more on this subject than you do......and have
> their reasons. If you dont approve, dont buy it!
> Jayanand
>
> Peter K. wrote:
>
> > You are making assumptions Marc. They "may" or "may not" sell enough
> > to break even. You would not know this unless you had access to their
> > financials, which you do not unless you are an insider. So they are
> > basically getting their name out there on a lens for some reason.
> > Whether its 1/10 of 1% or 10%, its still money thrown away for no
> > apparent reason.
> > It's kind of like making a 1984 Volvo in 2006. Why bother. There is
> > only a small market if any for something like this. And yes, I know
> > you own a 1984 Volvo. Terrible polluter those older vehicles you know.
> > You should buy a new car to help the earth! Even one with an auto
> > transmission would pollute far less than an old Volvo.  :-) (note the
> > smiley)
> >
> > Peter K
> >
> >
> > On 1/19/06, *Marc James Small* <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     At 11:38 AM 1/19/06 -0800, Peter K. wrote:
> >     >Not foolish at all Marc. As I stated, they are apprently going
> >     into a
> >     >shrinking market with a product that is long past its prime.
> >     Manual focus
> >     >lenses even for professionals on 35mm SLRs, are rarely purchased
> >     these
> >     >days. So Zeiss is the foolish one.    Peter K
> >
> >     Peter
> >
> >     Whether Zeiss is being foolish is one thing.  The central point is
> >     that
> >     this is a very minor part of their production -- 1/10 of 1% or
> >     maybe 1/100
> >     of 1% or less -- so the fiscal commitment is quite minor.  They will
> >     certainly sell enough to break even, and that is all that matters.
> >
> >     Marc
> >
> >     msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
> >
> >     NEW FAX NUMBER:  +540-343-8505
> >
> >
> >
> >     ---
> >     Rollei List
> >
> >     - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >     - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'subscribe'
> >     in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >     <//www.freelists.org>
> >
> >     - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with
> >     'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
> >     www.freelists.org <//www.freelists.org>
> >
> >     - Online, searchable archives are available at
> >     //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Peter K
> > Ó¿Õ¬
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>


--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬

Other related posts: