[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss Rolleiflex SL66 1:4/40 mm Distagon FLE HFT
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:26:18 -0300
2012/9/30 CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I don't think the Hasselblad SWC and SL 66 could be compared, they are
> very different cameras....
Perhaps a more right comparison is between the Rolleiflex FW and the
Hasselblad SWC, according the model and manufacture year, the SWC
could have lower, similar or higher price than the FW, the differences
are not so dramatic like for other Hasselblad models; the weight is
similar, the weight difference, if it existe, it's negligible, the FW
does not have a protruding lens and it does not have an external
viewfinder and then it's more compact than the SWC; the SWC
interchangeable magazines could be some advantage for some
professionals if you have several magazines and you need a lot of
shots, you could gain some seconds changing a magazine regarding to
load a new roll; the 38mm Biogon has 90º of diagonal coverage vs 75º
for the Super Angulo, however a decisive advantage for the FW is the
fact you have a reflex system to focus the subject all the time with
the standard means the camera provides.
Carlos
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
