[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss Rolleiflex SL66 1:4/40 mm Distagon FLE HFT
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:32:47 -0400
At 07:47 AM 9/29/2012, Eric Goldstein wrote:
Jim, there is nothing "native" about that
transparency. The mismatch between life and the
contrast limitation of the medium is glaring.
Had you shot negative or digital, the result
would have been dramatically different.
Your preferences/interpretation is another
matter... All I can say is there is no accounting for taste ;-)
Eric Goldstein
Eric,
Please clip your messages.
Your lust for digital is overwhelming. In light
of your rather stern views, I am certain that we
shall all immediately dump our film cameras and
get only digital gear hereafter.
Be well,
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
