[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss Rolleiflex SL66 1:4/40 mm Distagon FLE HFT
- From: Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxx>
- To: "rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:17:13 +0100
Jim it rust looks great!
Laurence cuffe
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Sep 2012, at 07:32, Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Uwe,
>
> It is not HDR. I didn't like the HDR version. I guess I wasn't clear.
> Sorry... You are seeing the original.
>
> I have an Imacon X1 scanner.
>
>
> Jim Brick
> Sunnyvale, CA
> http://www.photomojo.org
>
> On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:17 PM, Uwe Wolfgang Steinke wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> as I looked at the photo I thought "Wow, it looks like HDR - and it's just a
>> scan from an analog photo - great!" Now that I know that it's HDR, I'd like
>> to see the original - which I know is impossible...
>>
>> Anyway - which scanner do you use?
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> 2012/9/29 Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Hi John, I have been using HDR since HDR software has been available. I use
>> it both in my digital capture and in scanning. Sometimes, things just look
>> better (to me) in their native form. I do have both over and under of that
>> Hunter Liggett photograph, and I did scan all three and run them through
>> Photomatix. Still, for me, the way I have it, is the way I want it. Which,
>> as I said, is the bottom line.
>>
>> HDR certainly has become more sophisticated since its inception. In the
>> beginning, it was nearly impossible to use it with scanned frames as it
>> couldn't figure out how to align them. Nowadays, programs like Photomatix
>> and Photoshop CS6 have no trouble aligning multiple transparency scans.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> Jim Brick
>> Sunnyvale, CA
>> http://www.photomojo.org
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2012, at 1:02 AM, John Wild wrote:
>>
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>> I have found that by scanning at 2 or 3 different exposures – one under,
>>> one over and one normally – and combining them in HDR software that I can
>>> get more out of an image. If a transparency, there may not be enough in the
>>> shadows and highlights to pull out anyway.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28/09/2012 07:12, "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A digital sure would have done better with capturing contrast... no detail
>>>> in the shadow areas that come through on the scan...
>>>>
>>>> Eric Goldstein
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Uwe Wolfgang Steinke
>>>> <paintingwithlenses@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> awesome - digital cameras can hardly reach that!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/9/28 Chris Burck <chris.burck@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> beautiful colors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2012 6:33 PM, "Jim Brick" <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> It depends on what your idea of affordable is...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have one of these lenses for my SL66 and it is absolutely outstanding!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is an image via my 40mm FLE.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.photomojo.org/Yellow_Field_Oak_Tree-.jpg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim Brick
>>>>>>> Sunnyvale, CA
>>>>>>> http://www.photomojo.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Uwe Wolfgang Steinke wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Hi Carlos
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > and thanks for the superb answer!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Sooo, where do I get an affordable 4/40 FLE for my SL66 or 6008AF?
>>>>>>> > Lots of wishes for the next Christmases.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Uwe
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Rollei List
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
>>>>>>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>>>>>> <//www.freelists.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
>>>>>>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>>>>>> <//www.freelists.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Online, searchable archives are available at
>>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Uwe Wolfgang Steinke
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
