[rollei_list] Re: Care of the Rolleiflex covering

  • From: Jeffery Smith <jls@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:57:57 -0500

I just ordered some. My Rolleicord needs some attention. I hope this will work well for it.


At 10:21 AM 7/17/2006, you wrote:

Eric, I read through the site long ago and agree that there is some
conflicting information.

But I figured for $13, why not give it a shot....

With the $13 kit, you get a small tub of the plain stuff, a tin of
black and a tin of brown.  The colored stuff is in a tin the size of
KIWI shoe polish and the plain stuff is in a larger plastic tub.
There's a photo on the site.

Nothing can restore leather that has been neglected too long but I
had great results with this company's stuff on my black MX-EVS body
and the brown leather cases.

I used their non-colored stuff on the leather case's strap and it
LOOKED much better but it was too far gone.  I pulled on it with
some force and it fell apart.

So, even if it can't perform miracles, at least it won't do more
damage like most modern leather care products containing petroleum
or solvents.

One important thing to think about with your cameras is that this company's antique leather restoration product is a thick PASTE vs. Lexol being a liquid.

You have to be careful not to saturate the camera leather with Lexol or other liquid products or you're going to get moisture or something worse into the mecanical bits. It seems to me that this thick paste pretty much eliminates that problem.

BTW, I have zero affiliation with this company. I simply found them via GOOGLE and had great results.

- Jeff Kelley -




Very interesting and thanks for the link. Much of the language on this
site is very similar if not identical to the Lexol site!


I am a little sceptical of the claim these people make that their products can "restore" old stiff leather." Once fat-liquored leather has been neglected, lost it's oils and has dried out and stiffened, replenishing the oils will not "restore" it as most people (and conservation professionals) would defne the term. These folks acnowledge this on some of their content pages yet claim the opposite on others!


Eric Goldstein




---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list




---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: