Hi Marc, > A copy cannot exceed the > performance of the original, by definition. I'm not sure it's part of the definition. There are some cars, specifically the Ford GT-40 comes to mind, that had "copies" made by a company called ERA who bought the original molds etc. for the GT-40...and made great improvements in reliability to the original article. I'm sure there are many examples of "copies" being better than the original. Technically, no "copy" can ever be exactly the same as the "original", but how much of a difference that allows it to fall under the definition of "copy" is certainly up for question. Ed Romney's "copies" were better than the originals ;-) Regards, Austin --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list