[rollei_list] Re: Camera Weights
- From: "Ruben" <ruben@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:50:27 +0200
I think my Fuji GX 680 beat most SLRs in the Monster Weight department -
truly good for work out :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "New Rollei List" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 7:02 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Camera Weights
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ardeshir Mehta" <ardeshir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 9:18 PM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Camera Weights
>
>
>> On Thursday, April 14, 2005, at 10:26 PM, Richard Knoppow
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am now pooped from lifting all this stuff.
>>
>> Next time weigh a Minox B! Easier on the biceps.
>>
>> By the way, how does a Leica M3 or M4 compare in weight to
>> the Leica
>> IIIC?
>>
>> And what about Hasselblad vs. Rollei SLR?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>
> I am weighing cameras I have. I don't have a Leica M3 or
> M4, would anyone care to donate one? I understand that M4's
> are junk so I am sure someone out there would be happy to
> give me his/hers plus lenses (can't weigh it without
> lenses). Same for the Hassy.
> I can guess at the Mamiya RB/RZ 67. One really has to
> think of these as modern Graflex's. Hoever, I am now so
> strong from lifting other cameras that I would condecend to
> accept an RB or RZ if sent in a plain brown wrapper.
>
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
Other related posts:
