[rollei_list] Re: CLA questions...
- From: Nick Roberts <nickbroberts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:23:31 +0000 (GMT)
I would say ESPECIALLY a collector's camera that
hadn't been used would need a CLA!
Nick
(OK, perhaps not moreso than one heavily used in a
dusty or high humidity environment etc etc etc - but
non-use is almost always worse than use in my
experience.)
--- Kenneth Frazier <kennybod@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Jeff Kelley wrote:
>
> > Would even a "collector's camera" that was never
> used probably need
> > a CLA after sitting for decade
>
> Definitely. Over time the lubricants become gummy.
>
> Ken
> -----------------------------------
> The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
> Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
> Current Leica Photography (PAW):
> http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
>
> Current Medium Format Photos:
> http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
>
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
