[rollei_list] Re: Buy the local 80/2.8 or hold out for a 75/3.5?

  • From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:45:07 -0300

Eric, my 2.8C Xenotar is so valuable that it has no price... :-)
The item 310230213558 looks nice.

Carlos

2011/1/4 Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I agree with Richard and would add that $750 for C Xenotar is too much
> money...
>
>
> Eric Goldstein
>
> --
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Gori" <adam.gori@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:18 AM
>> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Buy the local 80/2.8 or hold out for a 75/3.5?
>>
>>
>>> I should add that it's a 2.8C xenotar with very extremely light marks on
>>> the
>>> taking glass, $750.
>>>
>>
>>    Its an excellent camera with an excellent lens, however, the "cleaning
>> marks" however light bother me. Cleaning marks are fine scratches and can
>> lower the contrast of the image surprizingly, much more than a couple of
>> deeper scratches. It also comes from carelessness in caring for the camera.
>> There is no reason to _ever_ scratch a lens, cleaning marks come from
>> scrubbing the surface with something abrasive, probably a dirty bit of
>> cloth.
>>    Open the camera and shutter and shine a flashlght through the lens to
>> see the true condition of the surfaces. Also, shine the flashlight across
>> the front surface and use a magnifying glass to examine it. These two tests
>> will show up a plethora of problems that are hidden from more casual
>> examination.
>>    As far as lens speed, I don't think there is any significant difference
>> in the performance of the f/2.8 vs f/3.5 Planar and Xenotar but there is
>> some difference in weight and balance. I have a 2.8E with a Xenotar in it,
>> one of the best cameras I have, but prefer a Rolleicord IV with an f/3.5
>> Xenar for its feel and ease of handling.
>>
>> --
>> Richard Knoppow
>> Los Angeles, CA, USA
>> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Rollei List
>>
>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the
>> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>
>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
>> the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>
>> - Online, searchable archives are available at
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>>
>
>
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: