Jerry,
todd
On 17-Aug-05, at 6:46 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
Richard,
I did that on my 2.8E2 and saw NO bellows. I won't bother checking my 2.8F.
Todd could straighten this out.
Jerry
Richard Knoppow wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "rollei list" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:30 PM Subject: [rollei_list] Bellows on 2.8D?
RUGers,
On the Medium Format Forum, some chap stated that his 2.8D had BELLOWS in it. Internally of course. Is this true? My 2.8E2 does not.
Eric, I believe that you have a 2.8D.
Can someone confirm this?
Jerry
---My 2.8E definitely has a short bellows. Rack focus out to maximum and shine a flashlight at the back of the taking lens, you should see a cloth surround there. Presumably, this forms a more reliable light trap than the plain telescoping tubes on earlier Rolleis. Perhaps it was used on only a few models.
--- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list