Well, I for one may put it on my "reading to make me fall asleep" pile but I would not waste much time in reading about antiquates lenses. I mean what's the point? At least Shudderbug (as you call it) is a bit more current and we may learn something about composing a photo. Now if Dechert talks about lenses that are current like the Canon 70-200mm F2.8L zoom I may be interested, but honestly the only antique I have any interest in is my Rollei. I do not even like older cars. Peter K On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > At 11:29 PM 10/24/2009, Eric Goldstein wrote: > >> Marc - >> >> Like Peter said, I think Jerry misunderstood. I did, too. I also thought >> that the Coke bottle pejorative was being tossed up against this legendary >> lens. >> >> Was the 47mm/2 Ektar on the Retina the same as the LTM lens? >> >> > I suspect that you folks would better spend your time in reading the > voluminous writings of Peter Dechert and coming to know him for the fine > scholar he is before jumping to absolutely unwarranted conclusions about his > praise for the 2/47 Ektar in a rather noted article in SHUDDERBUG, back in > the day. > > And buy my LTM lens book, where I cite Peter's comment. Of the hundreds of > folks who have read the book, none have ever questioned the spirit intended > by Peter when he made the remark. > > > Marc > > > > msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir! > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the > subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in > the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- Peter K Ó¿Õ¬