[rollei_list] Re: Another question about recent Rollei TLRs

  • From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 18:03:19 -0800

Correct! I HATE WITH A PASSION, all of that garbage that resides in the center 
of some screens. My Maxwell screens are PLAIN with grid. As were my Acute-Matte 
screens, as are the screens in all of my 35mm size SLR/DSLR cameras.

Jim


Jim Brick
Sunnyvale, CA
http://www.photomojo.org

On Jan 1, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Kirk Thompson wrote:

> I didn't anticipate so wide a difference of opinion about this!
> 
> I'm one of those who found Maxwell screens a great improvement over Rollei 
> screens up to 3.5Fv3.  So I'll just have to wait and look at one of the new 
> Rollei screens, compared to my F, & see if I'm impressed by the difference in 
> brightness.  I won't order a Maxwell screen ahead of time.  
> 
> Could the difference of opinion follow from the two versions of Maxwell 
> screens?  I have two that are plain grids and two that have split-image 
> focusing aids.  My experience is that the plain grids 'pop' right into focus, 
> but the focusing aids are harder to use and mostly a nuisance.  They're 
> brighter than Rollei screens, but the point of focus doesn't seem as decisive.
> 
> Just a guess: Perhaps Jim is using grid screens & Daniel tried the split 
> image?  
> 
> Kirk
> 
> PS, I certainly admire the image Carlos posted – not just for its sharpness 
> but for its way of making me think that I'm looking at the kind of '30s 
> Modernist machinery of which Rolleis are such an outstanding example.  
> 
> Here I am, wandering off my own topic, but:  Having just mentioned Rolleis 
> and Modernism, I wonder if thre's any source that discusses Rollei aesthetic 
> development??  I recently read the whole Philips book, and he surveys all 
> sources re: the engineering, but says nothing about their gorgeously evolving 
> external form.  IMO the Old Standard is a masterpiece of art deco design 
> (even more so than the embellished and 'officially' Art Deco Rolleicord); and 
> the Automat is my favorite example of before-and-after-the-war industrial 
> Modernism.  Any references about this?  In English or French – my German is 
> just too rusty?  
> 
> K
> 
> From: jim@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Another question about recent Rollei TLRs
> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 12:49:58 -0800
> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> I was using Hasselblads for decades before getting my Rollei SL66s. My 
> Hasselblads had the latest Acute-Matte D screens which were very bright, 
> corner to corner. By comparison, I could barely use the native SL66 focusing 
> screens. So I bought and installed Maxwell screens in my three SL66s. What a 
> HUGE difference. And focusing ease and accuracy with the Maxwell screens left 
> the Acute-Matte D screens in the dust! The Maxwell screens were hands down 
> better. If I were to keep my Hasselblads, I would have replaced the 
> Acute-Matte D screens with Maxwell screens.
> 
> When I was 14 (I'm 74 now) I got my first real camera, a Rolleicord III. With 
> young eyes, viewing and focusing seemed OK. But at some point later on, I got 
> a Rolleigrid - a fresnel lens that simply dropped in on top of the built-in 
> focusing screen. It did indeed brighten-up the viewing image and made 
> focusing easier.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Jim Brick
> Sunnyvale, CA
> http://www.photomojo.org
> 
> 

Other related posts: