Correct! I HATE WITH A PASSION, all of that garbage that resides in the center of some screens. My Maxwell screens are PLAIN with grid. As were my Acute-Matte screens, as are the screens in all of my 35mm size SLR/DSLR cameras. Jim Jim Brick Sunnyvale, CA http://www.photomojo.org On Jan 1, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Kirk Thompson wrote: > I didn't anticipate so wide a difference of opinion about this! > > I'm one of those who found Maxwell screens a great improvement over Rollei > screens up to 3.5Fv3. So I'll just have to wait and look at one of the new > Rollei screens, compared to my F, & see if I'm impressed by the difference in > brightness. I won't order a Maxwell screen ahead of time. > > Could the difference of opinion follow from the two versions of Maxwell > screens? I have two that are plain grids and two that have split-image > focusing aids. My experience is that the plain grids 'pop' right into focus, > but the focusing aids are harder to use and mostly a nuisance. They're > brighter than Rollei screens, but the point of focus doesn't seem as decisive. > > Just a guess: Perhaps Jim is using grid screens & Daniel tried the split > image? > > Kirk > > PS, I certainly admire the image Carlos posted – not just for its sharpness > but for its way of making me think that I'm looking at the kind of '30s > Modernist machinery of which Rolleis are such an outstanding example. > > Here I am, wandering off my own topic, but: Having just mentioned Rolleis > and Modernism, I wonder if thre's any source that discusses Rollei aesthetic > development?? I recently read the whole Philips book, and he surveys all > sources re: the engineering, but says nothing about their gorgeously evolving > external form. IMO the Old Standard is a masterpiece of art deco design > (even more so than the embellished and 'officially' Art Deco Rolleicord); and > the Automat is my favorite example of before-and-after-the-war industrial > Modernism. Any references about this? In English or French – my German is > just too rusty? > > K > > From: jim@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Another question about recent Rollei TLRs > Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 12:49:58 -0800 > To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I was using Hasselblads for decades before getting my Rollei SL66s. My > Hasselblads had the latest Acute-Matte D screens which were very bright, > corner to corner. By comparison, I could barely use the native SL66 focusing > screens. So I bought and installed Maxwell screens in my three SL66s. What a > HUGE difference. And focusing ease and accuracy with the Maxwell screens left > the Acute-Matte D screens in the dust! The Maxwell screens were hands down > better. If I were to keep my Hasselblads, I would have replaced the > Acute-Matte D screens with Maxwell screens. > > When I was 14 (I'm 74 now) I got my first real camera, a Rolleicord III. With > young eyes, viewing and focusing seemed OK. But at some point later on, I got > a Rolleigrid - a fresnel lens that simply dropped in on top of the built-in > focusing screen. It did indeed brighten-up the viewing image and made > focusing easier. > > Jim > > > Jim Brick > Sunnyvale, CA > http://www.photomojo.org > >