Harry isn't cheap and none of the other better ones are either.
Why some one will trust their camera to a bargain basement repair is
beyond me.
Slobodan Dimitrov Studio G-8, AGCC http://sdimitrovphoto.com
On Sep 24, 2005, at 9:03 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:30 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Advice needed
I don't know what Harry's current charges are but this camera may need more than a routine CLA. My 2.8E cost about $300 to get into shape because it was a beater and had lots of problems. I don't know how much more complicated later Rolleis are than the MX-EVS, the film wind is about the same. The F series cameras have a more complex method of guiding the front end. It has screw jacks to adjust it for parallelism rather than relying on shims.Richard,
Do you really think that Harry now gets $300 for a CLA on the simplest post war Rolleiflex made?
Jerry
Of course, the answer would be for the original poster to contact Harry. I am sure Harry does work equal to anyone else (if not better) and can personally vouch for him.
OCEANSIDE CAMERA REPAIR 909 AVIATION BLVD. #4 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 rolleirepairsbyharry.com 310-374-6506 http://www.rolleirepairs.com
--- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
