Ardishir & co (esp. Bob, Richard, Jim had he still been here...) assuming one was in the market for a "user" 4x5 <*> Graphic, what model/version would one be looking for? I know nothing about those cameras, but you've piqued my interest. I see that they often show up on eBay, although I have no idea of price. I don't have a darkroom for prints, but developing negatives isn't a problem. I have no plans (nor money) to buy anything now, but would like to know more. I can archive the thread for when I'm ready to pick something up :-) Thor On 19. apr. 2005, at 17.13, Ardeshir Mehta wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 19, 2005, at 04:50 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> [T]he advantage of 4x5 over medium format is [that] 4x5 has amazing >> creamy smooth high tones. Highlights. >> The lighter tones are thicker and more solid. >> That's the only way I can describe them. >> Better than medium format and much better than 35mm. >> Crispy as the small format stuff is. >> It's also crunchy. > > Amen. > > I find that neither of my two Rolleis can touch the quality of the pics > from my Anniversary Speed Graphic, when I do manage to shoot with the > Speed Graphic. But the number of pictures I take with the Speed Graphic > is minuscule compared with the number I take with my Rolleis (and now, > even my newly-acquired Contaflex), because of the hassle involved in > using LF, especially loading the film into individual holders. > > I just "won" two Grafmatic backs for the Speed Graphic on eBay, and > loaded one of them with B&W (the other has not yet arrived here), so I > hope that the situation will improve now. But the Kalart rangefinder on > the Anni is off, and will have to be fixed before I can use the Anni > hand-held. Or else another Kalart RF bought on eBay and fitted to the > Anni. > > Cheers. > > Ardeshir <http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >