[rollei_list] Re: About the 2.8 GX/FX kinship
- From: Marc James Small <msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:49:12 -0400
At 09:38 PM 6/13/06 +0000, Carlos Manuel Freaza wrote:
>According my experience, there are no quality
>differences; there are some different materials used
>for the F and GX/FX, for example the F internal
>baffles against the GX/FX foam used to diminish flare
>and a bit more of plastic used for some external GX/FX
>parts.
I agree that the quality of the construction of the GX is every bit as good
as that on the earlier T and F cameras. The late Leif Erickson beat the
hell out of a GX when producing his seminal review of the camera for
SHUDDERBUG fifteen years ago and reached the same conclusion, that the
quality was identical.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
