I wish I could say that I have been grown up since childhood.
On Dec 21, 2015 4:37 AM, <Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx> wrote:
I fully disagree.
The ergonomics using eye-level or groundglass viewing I found and still
found perfect without any additonal grip.
Much better ergonomic than using an ordinary 35 mm SLR.
Maybe my attitude comes from that I have been grown up from childhood
using TLRs only.
Dirk
*Von:* rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *Im Auftrag von *Peter Mattei
*Gesendet:* Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2015 20:03
*An:* rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Betreff:* [rollei_list] Re: AW: Re: Fw: SL 2000 F - and my attitude
about it
Sven, Agreed. The ergonomics at eye-level are difficult without the side
grip. The groundglass viewing requires the magnifier and by then you are
all balled-up into a "focus ball". Using a tripod helps a lot. Also,
having trigger buttons on both sides, while helpful, requires extra
caution. Peter
The main problem of the SL2000 – as I see it – is its ergonomics. If you
are used to other 35mm SLRs you will find that the SL2000 provides no
benefits over other SLRs but numerous disadvantages, starting with the fact
that you cannot even decently hold it without attaching a voluminous grip
first.
