I fully disagree.
The ergonomics using eye-level or groundglass viewing I found and still found
perfect without any additonal grip.
Much better ergonomic than using an ordinary 35 mm SLR.
Maybe my attitude comes from that I have been grown up from childhood using
TLRs only.
Dirk
Von: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Peter Mattei
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2015 20:03
An: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [rollei_list] Re: AW: Re: Fw: SL 2000 F - and my attitude about it
Sven, Agreed. The ergonomics at eye-level are difficult without the side
grip. The groundglass viewing requires the magnifier and by then you are all
balled-up into a "focus ball". Using a tripod helps a lot. Also, having
trigger buttons on both sides, while helpful, requires extra caution. Peter
The main problem of the SL2000 – as I see it – is its ergonomics. If you are
used to other 35mm SLRs you will find that the SL2000 provides no benefits over
other SLRs but numerous disadvantages, starting with the fact that you cannot
even decently hold it without attaching a voluminous grip first.
