[rollei_list] Re: 3.5F for $1,200?

  • From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:02:10 -0800

Marc,

Do you mean to tell me that you actually believe that
the 3.5F and 2.8F weigh the same? If so, you are too
f&^%$ing gullible.

I say, in legal language, BS!

Jerry

Marc James Small wrote:

> At 11:14 AM 12/4/05 -0800, Peter K. wrote:
> >Is it much heavier? Anyone have the weight differences?
>
> Here are some representative weights, camera bodies alone without cases,
> straps, hoods, &c:
>
> 3.5E            1120g
> 3.5E2           1120g
> 3.5E3           1120g
> 3.5F            1220g
>
> 2.8E            1255g
> 2.8E2           1250g
> 2.8FE3          1250g
> 2.8F            1220g
>
> In short, the 2.8E and F cameras were approximately 100g heavier than were
> their 3.5 contemporaries.  Contemplate this one, guys:  the difference is
> around 3.5 ounces.  This is hardly a world-shaker.
>
> Marc
>
> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
>
> NEW FAX NUMBER:  +540-343-8505
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. rollei_list
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2005