[rollei_list] Re: 3.5F Planar Rolleikin and 6x6 test
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:21:56 -0300
This is a practical test on a 3.5F Planar with Rolleikin and 6x6, The
camera image caption has an error, it's a 3.5F, not a 2.8F:
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze7asgb/newphotographythroughvintagecameras2/id8.html
Carlos
2009/12/6 CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2009/12/5 <aghalide@xxxxxxx>:
>> what is the time frame of the test you are referring to? I did the tests
>> during the time 1957 to 1965.
>
> I don't know the exact tests Stephen is referring to, however in the
> old RUG archives kept at the Ferdi's Rollei site there is a large post
> reproducing several Modern Photography tests and comments on new
> Rollei TLR lenses, I'd say from the comments and the firsts tests that
> the Xenotar 2.8/80 was a top lens, however as the testers wrote
> somewhere, they are individual lenses and I add that Zeiss and
> Schneider used the Rollei tolerances widely, but there were lenses,
> Planar and Xenotar, above/better than the tolerances and this fact
> could explain differences, I think Rollei TLR enthusiasts will enjoy
> these "tests":
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/fwstutterheim/rugarchives/1996-12/00121.html
>
> Carlos
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Re: 3.5F Planar Rolleikin and 6x6 test - CarlosMFreaza
