[rollei_list] Re: 127 Film for Babies
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:33:29 -0300
John:
This is a film thought for Lomography mainly. Lomography is
one of the ways to sell film today. It's a new film, according Maco.
It's interesting to note that the Redbird colors could change
according the shutter speed used and that since the film is exposed
through the base, it produces a slightly diffused image.
https://www.flickr.com/groups/analogue_photo/discuss/72157621897275883/
http://www.lomography.com/photos/films/871918560-rollei-redbird-400
Carlos
2014-04-19 5:14 GMT-03:00 John Wild <JWild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Peter,
>
> I bought some Redbird without fully realising what it was. It is designed to
> shoot through the film base colour so all photos have a strong red cast. When
> I got my prints back, I accused the processors of having 'messed it up’ -
> they denied it strongly ;-) And then I did more research - it is supposed to
> be ‘creative’. I had bought it as a colour film, which was its description
> but it had not been mentioned on the website that it was strongly red.
>
> I do not know why it is rolled that way. I expect Carlos will have an
> explanation but I would guess that most of these Rollei branded films are old
> stock and are rolled inside out as with Redbird & Nightbird and that
> Crossbird is recommended to be processed as E6 or C41 - is because the film
> is well out of date and treating it this way will be an excuse for the
> results not being what would be expected from today’s films. I have used
> Crossbird in E6 and I find the results are quite pleasing with a 60’s/70’s
> muted colouration.
>
> I have found that most of the ISO speeds recommended for Rollei films that I
> have used are not that accurate and tests should be carried out. The ISO for
> IR film I used without a filter was OK but using with the recommended speed
> of 12 ISO with an IR filter gave virtually nothing on the negative. I will
> try a roll at 1 ISO next time. I accept that it does depend on how much red
> there is in the subject but even reds were barely visible.
>
> 127 films are once again almost impossible to find again. Ferrania are asking
> for emails to gauge the potential market for out of production films because
> they hope to re-introduce some. Send them a message at
> http://www.filmferrania.it/contact/ saying what films types and formats you
> would be interested in purchasing if they start manufacturing again.
>
> John
>
>
> On 19 Apr 2014, at 00:29, rocketmanpm . <petermattei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I have some questions for RUG members:
>>
>> Has anyone used the 127 film being sold under the Rollei label?
>>
>> What reason justifies it being spooled backward so the emulsion is "behind"
>> the substrate?
>>
>> Is this configuration exceedingly objectionable?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
