[rc3r] Re: Better with link

  • From: "John Crockett" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "jctrainman" for DMARC)
  • To: "rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:34:22 +0000 (UTC)

What article?  It was all about the song, nothing else.John


-----Original Message-----
To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Jul 8, 2020 3:43 am
Subject: [rc3r] Re: Better with link

Russell,
     I wasn't referring to the song, it was the article about the news 
organizations.
Dexter


-----Original Message-----
To: rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2020 2:02 pm
Subject: [rc3r] Re: Better with link

REALLY ?????How is this beautiful song of patriotism anything but 
PATRIOTIC--NOT POLITICALI totally agree to your statement DexterMuch better 
than the daily jibberish I find totally boring and unworth of any 
response.Russell


-----Original Message-----
To: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2020 12:41 pm
Subject: [rc3r] Re: Better with link

    Let's keep our mass mailings to our hobby topics. Those that advocate 
political, and other controversial positions, are bound to find disfavor with 
some members. If one wants to send such statements, do so to individuals that 
are likely to agree with a particular stance.    I have made this observation 
in the past. Please respect it.
Dexter


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry P Carr <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rc3r <rc3r@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2020 10:10 am
Subject: [rc3r] Better with link 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrMftm6Km3g
Sent from my iPhone

Other related posts: