So may question. Is it possible to make naming of containers more flexible? I imagine that other Hypervisors might adopt other naming convention as well.
The virtual object types were named using VMware terminology. It seemed generic enough.
Also, although a Resource Pool in Xen is a different animal than one in VMware, in RackTables it's just a generic container which can be used to handle both scenarios.
As usual, detail the changes you would like made, and they will be considered...
-- Aaron Dummer