[racktables-users] Re: SNMP Query
- From: Mike Coles <bluelip@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:02:21 -0400
Is valid info returned when using the `snmpwalk` tool? Anything in the error
logs?
--
Mike'
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Carlson, Steven A. (LNG-SEA) <
Steven.Carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes…
>
>
>
> Cisco 6509E switches.
>
>
>
> *Steven A. Carlson*
> *Consulting Network Engineer*
>
> *From:* racktables-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> racktables-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Mike Coles
> *Sent:* Friday, August 28, 2009 11:09 AM
> *To:* racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [racktables-users] Re: SNMP Query
>
>
>
>
> What devices are you attempting to query? Are they supported by the script?
>
> --
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Carlson, Steven A. (LNG-SEA) <
> Steven.Carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have just installed rack tables and are trying to get the SNMP query of
> Cisco equipment to work. Have verified that the server that is hosting rack
> tables can query the devices, but when I enter the SNMP community string at
> the SNMP port finder tab and click go public immediately replaces the string
> and no ports are found. When I enter the wrong string it takes about 10
> seconds to timeout and then replaces the string, so it appears to
> successfully access the devices. What could be preventing rack tables from
> successfully querying Cisco devices.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Steven A. Carlson*
> *Consulting Network Engineer*
> Tel - +1 425-372-1807
> Email – *steven.carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*
> Mobile - +1 206-406-4935
>
>
>
Other related posts:
