We're running quite an old version of Cacti in my organization for various depressing reasons. Is there a minimum Cacti version requirement? Thanks guys. On 31 August 2011 06:34, Denis Ovsienko <infrastation@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > Nothing more... see > > http://www.roedie.nl/downloads/misc/racktables-3.jpg > > > > When requesting the cacti tab of the object I see the following in the > > access.log of the cacti server: > > > > 2001:67c:xxx:xx::x - - [31/Aug/2011:05:30:46 +0200] "GET > > /graph_image.php?action=view&local_graph_id=1 HTTP/1.1" 200 4171 "-" "-" > > 2001:67c:xxx:xx::x - - [31/Aug/2011:05:30:46 +0200] "POST > > /graph_image.php?action=view&local_graph_id=1 HTTP/1.1" 302 85 "-" "-" > > 2001:67c:xxx:xx::x - - [31/Aug/2011:05:30:46 +0200] "POST > > /graph_image.php?action=view&local_graph_id=1 HTTP/1.1" 200 15358 "-" > > "-" > > Thanks for diagnostics. So far it is clear, that Cacti authentication works > and graph data is delivered to RackTables image proxy. The data is probably > damaged on its way to RackTables HTTP client. Could you retry the IMG SRC > URL again to tell if RackTables server HTTP response misses headers, body or > both? Are there any extra bytes, which should not be there? In the > RackTables server access log, what are HTTP response code and content-length > for relevant requests (module=image&img=cactigraph)? > > -- > Denis Ovsienko > >