RE: 11i RAC question
- From: "Hameed, Amir" <Amir.Hameed@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <racdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:36:48 -0400
9.2.0.6 (64-bit) on Solaris. This question is in continuation of the
problem that I had sent a note out to this DL last Friday. I finally
opened a TAR last night with Oracle as it seemed like an Oracle issue to
me.
________________________________
From: racdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:racdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sudhi
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:29 AM
To: racdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 11i RAC question
Increasing the priority of LMS/LMD processes is a known thing
for performance. I'm not sure about the "_gc_defer_time". KG or Anand
should be aware of it.
BTW what version of RAC ?
Thanks,
-Sudhi.
________________________________
From: racdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:racdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hameed, Amir
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 6:55 PM
To: racdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 11i RAC question
Is there anyone in this DL running 11i with RAC? If yes then can
you please tell me if you had to make the following settings to address
some cache fusion issues:
+ alter system set "_gc_defer_time"=0;
+ Increase the priority of LMS process ( renice -n -p <PID of
LMS process> )
I have a TAR opened with Oracle and they are suggesting this
solution. I want to make sure that the solution is not custom and is a
generic one and has just not documented. Any feedback will be
appreciated.
Thanks
Amir
Other related posts:
