[ql06] TORTS; PUBLIC

  • From: Sheldon Erentzen <sheldon.erentzen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: QL'06 newslist <ql06@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, law123C-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:58:06 -0400

          AS APPEARING IN  THE NEW YORK TIMES


          (For people from section five this article is interesting in
          reference to our discussion from last class)



          October 15, 2003


    A Right-to-Die Battle Enters Its Final Days

By ABBY GOODNOUGH

INELLAS PARK, Fla., Oct. 14 -- Ever since Terri Schiavo's heart 
temporarily stopped beating one winter night in 1990, leaving her 
severely brain damaged, she has been a woman without a voice.

Mrs. Schiavo, now 39, can open her eyes and moan, her mouth sometimes 
forming a smile or grimace. She breathes on her own, but is fed through 
a gastric tube. Since she cannot speak for herself, those close to her 
-- along with thousands of strangers who never heard of Mrs. Schiavo 
before her misfortune -- have spoken and often shouted on her behalf.

Some, including her husband and legal guardian, Michael, say Mrs. 
Schiavo would choose death over the life she has now, although she left 
no living will or other instructions. Others -- including her parents, 
Bob and Mary Schindler, and her siblings -- contend that she fiercely 
wants to live -- and that even if she did not, life in any form is worth 
holding onto.

The arguments, made in courtrooms, churches and newspaper columns, on 
talk radio and even in the governor's office, have been exhausted. A 
judge has ordered that Mrs. Schiavo's feeding tube be removed on 
Wednesday as her husband has requested; without nourishment she would 
die within weeks.

In recent days, dozens of people have joined Mrs. Schiavo's parents and 
siblings in front of the hospice where she resides in this suburb of 
Tampa, waving signs that say things like "Euthanasia Takes Place Here" 
and begging Gov. Jeb Bush, who has publicly sided with the Schindlers, 
to stop her death.

Mr. Bush told reporters in Tallahassee on Tuesday that while he wanted 
Mrs. Schiavo to live -- he filed a brief on her parents' behalf in a 
separate, short-lived federal court case last week -- there was nothing 
more he could do. That leaves the Schindlers out of options in their 
five-year legal battle with Mr. Schiavo, who has declined to speak with 
reporters in recent months.

"All we want is to bring Terri home," said Mr. Schindler, who has paced 
outside the hospice for much of this week, smoking cigarettes and 
wearily repeating his views to whoever will listen. "Our objective is 
just to get her the treatment that she deserves."

Mrs. Schiavo's situation is not nearly as cut and dried as some other 
right-to-die cases, because she is not elderly, comatose or hooked up to 
a respirator. And most of the facts are in dispute. Mr. Schiavo says his 
wife once told him that she would never want her life prolonged 
artificially; he believes doctors who have testified that Mrs. Schiavo 
is in a persistent vegetative state, unable to think or swallow food. A 
doctor appointed by the court supported this finding, as did those hired 
by Mr. Schiavo.

But other doctors have testified that with intensive therapy, their 
daughter could eat and perhaps even speak. On Tuesday, the Schindlers 
showed reporters a videotape of Mrs. Schiavo groaning loudly and staring 
at her mother as her mother leaned over her bed and spoke to her. 
Randall Terry, the former leader of the antiabortion group Operation 
Rescue, who is keeping vigil at the hospice in a last-ditch effort to 
sway the courts, said the video was proof that Mrs. Schiavo could feel 
and comprehend.

"This is someone who's cognitive, folks," said Mr. Terry, who the 
Schindlers said called them over the weekend and promised that his 
presence could sharply increase news media coverage of the case. "This 
is not a person in a vegetative state."

Mrs. Schiavo's family and supporters vow that the debate that has 
swirled around her case for years will not die with her. The questions 
at the heart of her case -- how much evidence courts need to decide 
whether an incapacitated person would prefer death, and if evidence is 
lacking, whose opinion should matter most -- is likely to resonate long 
after she is gone.

"This is just the precipice," said JoAnne Zappala, who lives in the area 
and said she believed that Mrs. Schiavo should die until she met her 
sister, Suzanne Carr, a few months ago. "If they pull the plug on this 
woman, do you then take other disabled people who can't feed themselves? 
This opens a Pandora's box."

Carrie Kirkland, who read about the Schiavo case on the Internet and was 
protesting in front of the hospice on Monday, said she would continue 
lobbying Mr. Bush and the State Legislature to change Florida's 
so-called right-to-die law, which allows courts to consider testimony 
about the wishes of someone on life support if the person left no 
written directive. Other states' laws, including New York's, are stricter.

"We don't even divine hanging chads in this state," Ms. Kirkland said, 
referring to Florida's botched count in the 2000 presidential election, 
"and yet we're divining that Terri wants to die. Floridians will take a 
stand so that these laws can be revisited."

Kenneth Goodman, director of the Bioethics Program at the University of 
Miami, said Mrs. Schiavo's parents had read too much into her gestures.

"Very often, people in persistent vegetative states have reflexive 
actions that mimic for all the world an ordinary human action," Dr. 
Goodman said. "If it's someone you love, you are inclined to attach 
meaning to it."

Dr. Goodman said that disputes as intractable as the one between Mrs. 
Schiavo's husband and parents were extremely rare, and that the 
animosity was turning the situation into the "ugliest end-of-life case 
ever."

The Schindlers use the word "hate" to describe their feelings toward 
their son-in-law. They even theorize that Mr. Schiavo strangled their 
daughter that night in 1990, pointing to at least one doctor's finding 
that she had a rigid neck when she arrived at the hospital. Shortly 
before her brain damage, Mrs. Schiavo, who her family described as shy 
and insecure, told them she wanted a divorce.

The Schindlers also question why Mr. Schiavo did not spend the $1 
million he won in a medical malpractice suit on rehabilitative therapy 
for his wife.

Mr. Schiavo's lawyers have suggested that the Schindlers wanted custody 
of their daughter just to get some of the malpractice money. On Tuesday, 
George Felos, Mr. Schiavo's lawyer, repeated what his client had said 
all along: that he loves his wife and is simply carrying out her wishes.

"This is not about what Terri's parents want for her or what Michael 
wants for her," Mr. Felos said. "The court has determined, by clear and 
convincing evidence, that she made a competent decision not to be kept 
alive in this kind of situation."

Mr. Felos said that once Mrs. Schiavo's feeding tube was removed, her 
body chemistry would "swing out of balance" within days and she would 
"slowly start to fade away." Her death would be "comfortable," he said, 
and would take place within two weeks.

Dr. Goodman, the medical ethicist, said he kept looking for a lesson for 
his students in the Schiavo case and saw only this: "It will underscore 
that it's never too early to talk to family members and loved ones about 
advance care wishes."

Mr. Schindler, who continues to visit his daughter daily, said he had 
not begun to think what Terri's death would mean for his wife and him. 
His eyes brimmed on Monday as he described how he had kissed her that 
afternoon and how she had smiled. Mr. Terry, taking a break from his 
cell phone, put a hand on Mr. Schindler's shoulder and murmured, "God 
have mercy."

Outside the air-conditioned trailer that the Schindler family has 
stationed outside the hospice for the week, cars honked at the pickets 
and police officers guarded the building's entrances.

"After today," Mr. Schindler said, "I don't have a plan."




Other related posts:

  • » [ql06] TORTS; PUBLIC