[ql06] Re: PUBLIC: Civil liberties
- From: mark bumstead <2mab8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ql06@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:54:34 -0400
So then you would limit the tools available to defend the Charter
rights? No tools from contract law? Aren't we living under a social
contract, be it in accordance with Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, or Bob Rae
(sorry for swearing)?
Mark
>Mark then writes:
>
> >Assuming they could waive them, can a person who has no input
> >to the rules, truly consent to them? See Horne v. Midland
> >Railway Company, Cornwall Gravel Co. Ltd. v. Purolator
> >Courier Ltd. etc.
>
>I would seem to me (and what the hell do I know?) that you are
>conflating contractual rules with equity rules.
Other related posts:
