[pythran] Re: What are you implementing?
- From: Pierrick Brunet <pierrick.brunet@xxxxxxxx>
- To: pythran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:34:45 +0100 (CET)
----- Mail original -----
> De: "serge Guelton" <serge.guelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> À: pythran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Envoyé: Vendredi 22 Novembre 2013 10:12:16
> Objet: [pythran] Re: What are you implementing?
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:34:23PM +0100, Pierrick Brunet wrote:
> > Pierrick : Nothing for now :-) I was on Import and now I will :
> > pass new benchmark and/or remove useless stmt pass
>
> Pass new benchmarks (the one I sent on the mliste during SC) seems
> more
> important to me. You also have to polish (and benchmark!) your lazy
> branch ;-)
>
> > About remove useless stmt pass, it is mainly function and import.
> > - Import because it may avoid a crash if user import a module we
> > don't know but which is not use.
> > - Function because useless function may use unknown module and
> > cause crash. It may happen more often with imported module.
>
> Both are False, because you cannot decide if the import function is
> useless if you don't know it (e;g. it can print something on the
> screen)
#pythran export foo()
import baba
def bar():
baba.lala()
def foo():
print a
I am sure in this case that import baba is useless AND bar function too.
>
> > Also, It may save compilation time.
> > (for now, it may happen to have useless function compiled if
> > constant folding evaluate each call to a function)
>
> True!
>
>
Other related posts:
