[pythran] Re: Moving to xsimd
- From: serge guelton <serge.guelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pythran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 09:03:56 +0100
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:43:32PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Do you really want to find euclidean_distance as hypot(x)**2? Isn't it faster
to do real(x)**2 + imag(x)**2?
Might not be standard conforming though.
You're right! That's just an example of genericity, probably not the
best one though :-)
Other related posts:
