> OK, I hadn't thought of that aspect of the Python yet - that's nice! So > basically you could handle any terrain that allows you to put you hands > on the ground. I could imagine that narrow paths through undergrowth > would be very nasty though - you're very broad at the base and you don't > want to put your hands in thorn-bushes. Of course, a real python has better offroad capabilities ;-) I will make a small video of me going offroad, so that you can see how it works. > What I noticed when browsing through the galleries: > The BB-height seems to be very high compared to the seat height and > angle (especially the angle!). I noticed that the recumbents I know off > have their BB's about 10-15 cm higher than the seat height. Would you > mind to measure how this is with your Python? I measured 19 cm. > Some time ago I wrote a kind of formula to determine how much > (theoretically and approximately :)) the center pivot would rise at a > certain degree. That would be really useful when changing sizes and the > like. I don't know where I put it though, but I think I could > "calculate" it again, though I was already sure it wasn't entirely > correct (didn't know of a way to make it). There is one formula to calculate the pivot rising depending on the steering angle (alpha), the turning angle (beta) and the trail (n): n * sin (alpha) * cos (alpha) * (1 - cos (beta)) With this formula you get a maximum with a steering angle of 45 deg. But the practice is much more complicated because the wheel flop will increase, thus destabilizing the bike. I gave up calculating the optimum, and still recommend an angle around 65 degrees. Jürgen. ============================================================ This is the Python Mailinglist at freelists.org Listmaster: Juergen Mages jmages@xxxxxx ============================================================