[python] Re: Rear Suspension
- From: Ken Pendergrass <kenp794@xxxxxxx>
- To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Hi Jurgen,
I think revising your construction instructions is a great idea. However there
is a certain historic value to the original perhaps you should just make a new
simplified version? I confess I haven't built my python yet but I have no
desire to include a suspension.
Ken
________________________________
From: Jürgen Mages <jmages@xxxxxx>
To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, February 23, 2011 5:21:20 AM
Subject: [python] Rear Suspension
Hello Rod,
it is not a bad idea to leave out the rear suspension. Considering the mount of
effort, weight and the possibility of failure it seems not really worth to
include a rear suspension.
So, I am thinking of revising my building side:
http://www.python-lowracer.de/construction.html
The goal is, to simplify the building process and to save weight.
As I never rode unsuspended Pythons, I am curious to hear some experiences from
you and other riders. Any cracks of the rear frame yet?
Cheers,
Jürgen.
On 22.02.2011 01:35, r.mccrady@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> My wheel base is 114cm, with 26" (mountain bike standard) wheels. I
> built it following the P3 instructions from Jurgen, but I didn't
> include the rear suspension.
>
> -Rod McCrady Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
============================================================
This is the Python Mailinglist
//www.freelists.org/list/python
Listmaster: Jürgen Mages jmages@xxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an empty mail to python-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field.
============================================================
Other related posts:
