Nick Zentena wrote:
http://www.butzi.net/rodenstock/apo-sironar-s/page2.htm Don't know if that's your version or not.
No, I believe it's the older Sironar N. However, unless it is misassembled or the view camera components are out of spec, I doubt that on the same film at the same magnification using a reasonably small aperture you could tell the difference between the Rodenstock and the Zeiss. They both are probably diffraction limited by f/11 anyway. Of course the assumption is a stable tripod and no wind.
Chauncey ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.