[pure-silver] Re: [pure-silver]: FYI

  • From: Ron Schwarz <rs@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:11:50 -0400

03:29 PM 9/11/2004 -0700, Jim Brick wrote:
 
>pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx is now at 180.
>
>I personally see no reason to even contemplate closing it down, even if 
>someone else starts-up another pure-silver list. At 180, it seems 100% 
>viable. Plus the fact that freelists.org has a pretty impeccable track 
>record. And, of course, freelists keeps a searchable archive of the posts. 
>The majority of the pure-silver heavy hitters are subscribed to freelists. 
>I think everyone is quietly waiting for the anti-freelists and decision by 
>committee chatter to die down before much photographic dialog is 
>resurrected. I haven't said anything about the negative chatter as I know 
>it will burn itself out before too long.
>
>So what more does anyone want? A list with no hardware/spam/virus 
>headaches, quick response, and a searchable archive seems pretty good to me.
>
>If anyone wants more, let me know what it is and I will see what I can do.

I'm holding out for a pound of either Kenyan coffeebeans or Panatomic X
(120), my choice.

Or, both, if you're feeling generous. <g>


-- 
         Website: http://www.michi-kogaku.com/
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts:

  • » [pure-silver] Re: [pure-silver]: FYI