[pure-silver] Re: Split printing C41
- From: "Michael Healy" <emjayhealy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:12:57 -0700
Thanks, Ralph and Richard.
I was not referring to the Innocent Form of split printing, that involves
burning and
dodging. Rather, I had in mind that Cruel and Insidious Trickery detailed by
Anshell.
What caught my eye, Ralph, was what I **thought** seemed to be your declaration
that
with C41, you are wasting your time trying this at all, as opposed to using it
with silver
halide. I thought you were referring to some emulsion difference I wasn't aware
of, and
meant to discount the functionality of split printing with C41. That's why I
asked. I'd
never heard of or experienced any such difference between the films themslves.
The
idea seems implausible, or at any rate irrelevant to a discussion of either
type of split
printing. Obviously, though, this isn't what you meant. And I thought I had
stumbled onto
some well-kept Secret!
Mike
On 1 Oct 2004 at 2:14, DarkroomMagic wrote:
> Michael
>
> As Richard explained in his note, there simply is no difference
> between two split-grade exposures or one equally balanced exposure
> unless you do some local dodging during one of the split-grade
> exposures. Mixing light in one go or doing it in two separate
> exposures results into the same thing. The power of split-grade
> printing lies in the ability to dodge only during the hard or soft
> exposure, which is something you just can't do in a single-grade
> exposure.
>
> For more info go to my site at www.darkroomagic.com and look for the
> pdf on 'Basic Split-Grade Printing' in the 'Book' section. It is a
> great technique, but there is no magic to split-grade printing.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Ralph W. Lambrecht
>
>
>
>
> On 9/30/04 9:17 PM, "Michael Healy" <emjayhealy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Ralph, I'm curious to know why you say this. In printing to color
> > papers, yes, split printing would seem to be pointless; but b&w
> > papers are dealing with light and dyes - blue and green dyes. By
> > split printing (using a color head enlarger, anyhow, with magenta
> > and yellow), you capitalize on this by severely narrowing the
> > spectrum of the light color so it more or less affects only one of
> > the dyes. Magenta will register the shadows, yellow will bring out
> > details. I can't for the life of me see how film type would negate
> > this.
> >
> > Mind you, I've only ever split printed silver gelatin and HIE. When
> > I printed w/ b&w C-41, it was prior to discovering the split method.
> > So maybe there's a distinction here that would be obvious to someone
> > who had tried?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On 30 Sep 2004 at 17:57, DarkroomMagic wrote:
> >
> >> He is probably referring to split-grade printing, which is the
> >> combination of two separate exposures, one with a soft and the
> >> other with a hard filter. It is a very useful tool when local
> >> dodging or burning is combined with this technique. Otherwise, it
> >> is exactly the same as using a color enlarger and mixing soft and
> >> hard filtration in one exposure.
> >>
> >> Nevertheless, it has no influence on your problem. It doesn't help
> >> or hurt in printing C41 films.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ralph W. Lambrecht
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/30/04 2:19 PM, "shannon stoney" <sstoney@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> we always have one or two students each session who try printing
> >>>> c-41 processed b&w negatives. the times will be longer and the
> >>>> contrast can be a stuggle; however, it can be done. Someone
> >>>> suggested that split printing is very helpful with these
> >>>> negatives. I shot some stuff using a roll of Kodak's version to
> >>>> experiment with split printing to have a better understanding so
> >>>> i could better assist my students. It is still on my list to
> >>>> accomplish before the end of the year.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What is split printing?
> >>>
> >>> --shannon
> >>>
> >>> ==================================================================
> >>> == ========== =============================== To unsubscribe from
> >>> this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the
> >>> same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> >>> and unsubscribe from there.
> >>
> >> ===================================================================
> >> === ======================================= To unsubscribe from
> >> this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the
> >> same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> >> and unsubscribe from there.
> >
> >
> >
> > ====================================================================
> > ========== =============================== To unsubscribe from this
> > list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same
> > e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
> > unsubscribe from there.
>
> ======================================================================
> ======================================= To unsubscribe from this list,
> go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail
> address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe
> from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
