Sorry, prior to washing, of course. Thanks for catching that one! Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht http://www.darkroomagic.comThis electronic message contains information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, printing or any other use of, or any action in reliance on, the contents of this electronic message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and destroy the original message immediately.
P don't print this e-mail unless you really have to On Nov 25, 2009, at 03:34, BertS wrote:
Ralph W. Lambrecht wrote:RichardThanks a lot. This is all good information. However, you are making a lot of references to paper processing again. That's not my concern. Can we limit this conversation to film please? Nevertheless, the first part was VERY interesting, but I don't think it applies either.Here is why: 1. I am using an acid fixer. 2. I am not using a hardener. 3. I am using HCA prior to the fix.Given that, the diffusion theory seems to work, and in my opinion, HT-1 is a very good test, despite its reputation, if properly applied. My comparison to methelen-blue test verifies that. I just like a bit more sensitivity, which I was hoping to get from the other formula.Do think its worth a try?You are using HCA _PRIOR_ to fixing? But there is no hypo present until the fixing is done.What is the purpose of using HCA in this manner? Bert (curious)= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ====================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.