[pure-silver] Re: Kodak vs Ilford
- From: "Jason McPeak" <mcpeak.jason@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0500
I agree on the delta series. I usually use rodinal (agfa) as a developer or
d-76/id-11. I occaisonally use ilfotec hc (hc-110 in liquid form).
On 3/19/08, allandan <allandan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have always found Tmax 400 to be a difficult film to process (not so
> with Tmax100). I think the Delta films are superior in grain and
> processing ease at the 400 speed, and pretty much the same at 100 speed.
>
>
> Allan
>
>
>
> İbrahim Pamuk wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have used HP3 and FP4 once upon a time and swiched to Tri-X and
> > Plus-X. Then somewhat used Tmax100 & 400. I always preferred to use
> > Kodak HIE. I was wondering comparison between Tmax and Delta films.
> > Any reccommendation about these? I believe it is hard to prefer after
> > one being use Tri-X and then switch to HP5 for example. Nevertheless
> > it will worth to hear the experience in comparison with Tri-X vs HP5
> > and Tmax vs Delta?
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > Ibrahim Pamuk
> >
>
>
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
--
I am a leaf on the wind! Watch how I soar.
-Hoban "Wash" Washburn
(serenity movie)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://mcpeak.jason.googlepages.com/home
Other related posts:
