Well, I use both a 90/8 Super-Angulon and a 90/6.8 Angulon. Aad a 121mm/8 SA and a 120/6.8 Angulon and a 165/6.8 Angulon... And some even older ones... The only "problems" I have with the SA's is the size and weight compared to the Angulons. And that the aperture in the shutter of my 121/8 is wrong, so it doesn't open up past f:10 or so. It's still a great lens, affording plenty of movements on 5x7". So's the 90/8 on 4x5", on my 5x7" the bellows are too compressed to get much movement. Ole Tjugen 13.09.04 08:05:01, "Michael Healy" <emjayhealy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I dunno, seems like everybody has to flex a big one over Nikons. Am I the only >one >who's not unhappy at all with an ancient (circa-1958) Schneider f8? Sure, it's >passe >fashion-wise, and there's no arguing but that it's slow; but look at it this >way. If it was any >faster, I'd get done right away, and tehn grow bored with photography. Then >I'd end up >joining the Six Squabbling Fools who spent all that bandwidth and the last >week of days >yammering 24/7about the fascist dictator Jim Brick always was. Makes slow look >pretty >good. <snip> ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.