[pskmail] Re: pskmail thread in WL2Kemcomm yahoo-group
- From: Rein Couperus <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:09:11 +0200
The only things necessary for integrating winlink and pskmail is for winlink to
* allow POP on winlink.org email addresses
* remove the web form barrier for people who want to send email to a
winlink.org account
from pskmail. (how can you use a web form if you are at sea and have only
pskmail?)
or you could change winlink to handle normal email accounts. Pskmail is fully
open
and uses only standard protocols on the server side (POP, SMTP, HTTP).
I cannot get at the yahoogroup discussion, as they wanted me to subscribe, and
I am getting enough mail already :)
73,
Rein PA0R
for Wolf, I saw your attempts last night... SM0RWO was reading you fine most
of the time, but you did not ack, so the problem is still on the receiving side
at
your end... IS0GRB is S8 here during most of the day (we were still chatting
23:00 local).Have you tried a separate receive loop to increase S/N?
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Gesendet: 10.09.07 22:57:09
> An: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [pskmail] pskmail thread in WL2Kemcomm yahoo-group
>
> Hi all!
>
> Have you seen a real long discussion thread in the winlink-emcomm
> yahoo-group?
> Perhaps you can follow this link:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wl2kemcomm/messages/18632?threaded=1&m=e&var=1&tidx=1
>
> Personally I would like to see a combination of WL2K-Pactor and the
> PSKmail system. The linking could be realized with standard protocols
> like telnet, pop3 and smtp. Any modular system is perfect to be used in
> emcomm-enviroments. Many user told me about very expensive equipment
> (PTC) to be part of the WL2K system via pactor. When the ham can use
> their existing psk-equipment to transfer emails and enjoy the other fine
> features in pskmail - this could be a high value module in the whole
> emcomm system. But w/o attachments, that's - for me - the only main
> disadvantage.
>
> 73 de Wolf, oe7ftj
>
> BTW:
> @Per: I could not hear sm0rwo on any other qrg than 30m.
> @Per and Roberto: I have seen your beacons on 30m, but they where
> demaged and fldigi could not decode the whole frames.
>
>
>
--
http://pa0r.blogspirit.com
Other related posts:
