[pskmail] Re: psk500
- From: Russell Blair <russell_blair86@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Andy, Are you using fldigi 3.13AZ PSK500 with puppy mail. ?
Russell
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to
take everything you have.
- Thomas Jefferson
" IN GOD WE TRUST "
Russell Blair (NC5O)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
----- Original Message ----
From: Andy obrien <k3ukandy@xxxxxxxxx>
To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, October 29, 2009 5:38:05 PM
Subject: [pskmail] Re: psk500
I have not had a PSKMAIL transfer using PSK500...yet. I did a FLARQ
file transfer with PSK500 and did better than slower more robust
modes.
Andy K3UK
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Roger G6CKR <radio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Given that I was not the target and therefore not in control of the
> repeat requests and most likely on the edge of the range of the server
> I would say not bad.
> could not make comparison as no other mode was in use while I was
> monitoring.
> 73 Roger
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 11:13 +1100, John Douyere wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> And how good was the reception in PSK500, especially compared to the
>> other PSK modes?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Roger G6CKR <radio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> Watched a fair bit of traffic on 80m tonight.
>> Updated the java client and managed to get a ping from 9A1CRA
>> 73 Roger
>> G6CKR
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
