[pskmail] Re: beacon reverted to minute 0
- From: "Rein Couperus" <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:02:10 +0200 (CEST)
I have changed the code in such a way that the beacon minute is now taken
directly off the spinner...
So WhatYouSeeIsWhatYouGet... whatever is in the config file.
Tested here with 10, 30 and 60 minute periods... version 0.9.4-1
Rein PA0R
>VNC access should be working with the same details if you want to remote
>test.
>Not tested via the Mi-Fi Second internet route but the settings on the
>new router look right.
>Otherwise I await your findigs
>Roger
>On 19/04/11 19:14, Rein Couperus wrote:
>> I think I found it, testing....
>>
>> Rein
>>
>>> On 19/04/11 12:08, G6CKR wrote:
>>>> On 19/04/11 10:04, G6CKR wrote:
>>>>> On 18/04/11 21:12, G6CKR wrote:
>>>>>> perfs say minute 2 window says minute 2.
>>>>>> Since 18:15 it has reverted to minute 0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&call=G6CKR&limit=50&view=normal
>>>>>> has the evidence.
>>>>>> 73 Roger
>>>>>>
>>>>> Restarted Jpskmail and touched nothing the first beacon went on minute 0
>>>>> despite showing 2 in the window. I clicked up to 3 and back down to 2
>>>>> and it went again on the 2 (08:17:28 UTC on the raw data) I will leave
>>>>> it alone to see if it reverts back to 0 by it's self.
>>>>> 73 Roger
>>>>>
>>>> I see from raw packets that my client has reverted the minute 0 again.
>>>> I have not been back into the shack.
>>>> Is it refreshing something and reading the default instead of the config
>>>> file ?.
>>>> Rein I have the dynamic address updating for the domain now so a look
>>>> see is possible again. But I will update the second machine later today
>>>> and see if it behaves the same way first.
>>>> 73 Roger
>>>>
>>>>
>>> removed jpskmail and .pskmail folders from second machine.
>>> Used the installer for 9.0.3 but before first run replaced the.jar with
>>> 9.0.4 version.
>>> filled in basic details and set bcn minute to 2.
>>> first beacon correct now reverted to 0 on this machine.
>>> I'm stumped.
>>> 73 Roger G6CKR
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
