[pskmail] Re: Status of version 0.5
- From: Rein Couperus <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:14:24 +0200
Leigh,
The cause is simple (as always), Dave had implemented this for his flarq
program and asked if I
could use it. It was better than the file system interface, so I took the time
to change it.
I would be more in favour of a TCP socket, and I am sure that will be easy to
implement
in some future. In pskmail the changes will be trivial.
73,
Rein PA0R
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Gesendet: 03.08.07 06:58:05
> An: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [pskmail] Re: Status of version 0.5
>
> Rein,
> I saw this go into the codebase and wondered why you and Dave choose SV
> message queues instead of a socket interface. Sockets would mean you
> could run PSKMail and fldigi even on separate computers, and would (he
> says selfishly) simplify my task of providing remote PSK operations.
> I'm still going ahead with my work on a threaded TCP interface for
> fldigi, but it's a shame there's not more overlap.
> Leigh/WA5ZNU
>
> Rein Couperus wrote:
> > Starting with version 0.5 pskmail will get a new interface to fldigi, which
> > is
> > based on the POSIX System V message queue. That interface is not depending
> > on the
> > location fldigi is installed, making it much easier to install pskmail.
>
>
>
--
http://pa0r.blogspirit.com
Other related posts:
