[pskmail] Re: Server & Hamlib Question....
- From: Per Crusefalk <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:08:16 +0200
Hi all,
A few more comments...
On fre, 2007-09-28 at 08:09 -0700, Rob Frohne wrote:
<cut/>
> > > 5) Is there a good way to run outgoing messages through a human filter?
> > > We don't
> > > want spam going out and there are some rules regarding message content
> > > here in the US
> > > anyway.
> >
> > The server logs all traffic (server.log).
> It seems like inappropriate messages could get through, and even be
> logged for the FCC to supina. :-) I suppose I could have incoming mail
> sent to me, and I could forward it on to a secret email address. Is
> there a better way?
I would use postfix and procmail to put outgoing messages on hold
pending review. A very crude method could be to tell postfix to send
messages from the pskmail server to your email instead of the intended
address. Postfix is capable of so many things that this should not be a
big issue. What email server are you going to use? You could have a
local postfix on the pskmail server and handle outhoing email there.
>
> I noted your previous note about STANAG 4285. I'm sure you must have
> seen Charles Brain's experiments with it.
> http://www.chbrain.dircon.co.uk/hfemail.html Is what you are working on
> going to be legal in the US?
Yes, I received the code from Charles. He had built a STANAG 4285 for
the ax25 stuff in linux. It would interface to an ax25 device and extend
ip that way. I have removed the ax25 stuff from the code and I have it
running without it. At the moment I have a simple named pipe into it so
I intend to change to the current pskmail<->fldigi IPC. I will start
bench testing it and work on it for a while, its fun code :-)
Regarding illegal or not I cant say. STANAG 4285 is a robust mode
capable of speeds ranging between 75 and 2400 bps. There is 3600 as well
but I don't consider that robust. Its a single tone mode and its
bandwidth is 3000 Hz. I intend to lower that bandwidth and make it fit
within say 2200 Hz (it will be slower then). I don't know if you guys
are familiar with this stanag but it is a really good mode. Just adding
the interleaver makes fading easier to handle, fec, multipath capability
and I cant name all the things in there already. PSK31-250 is like a toy
for children in comparison. But, it does come with a price tag:
bandwidth.
I wonder how Pactor can be legal, pactor 3 is capable of 3600 bps is it
not ? Pactor 2 can do 800 bps (if my memory serves me right)?
Well, then you can set the same speeds here and relax :-)
Or, what did I miss?
Its perfectly legal here.
73 de Per, sm0rwo
> PSKMail is a great thing! Thanks so much for making it a reality.
>
> 73,
>
> Rob, KL7NA
>
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Rein PA0R
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the advice!
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > > Rob, KL7NA
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rob Frohne, Ph.D., P.E.
> > > E.F. Cross School of Engineering
> > > Walla Walla University
> > > 100 SW 4th Street
> > > College Place, WA 99324
> > > (509) 527-2075
> > > http://www.wallawalla.edu/~frohro/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Other related posts:
